<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Cyclingnews Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/</link>
	<description>Cycling Tips, Hints, and Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timbo</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3480</link>
		<dc:creator>Timbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-3480</guid>
		<description>Baggers of Twitter clearly aren&#039;t business people/brains.

Check out Jeff Jarvis and Robert Scobleizer for insight into the goldmine that is the live data &amp; metadata behind Twitter (and to a larger extent, Facebook).

Once filtering of Twitter becomes better and better, there&#039;ll be some amazing value in the link economy.

I basically do not twitter unless I have something useful/a useful link.

-t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baggers of Twitter clearly aren&#8217;t business people/brains.</p>
<p>Check out Jeff Jarvis and Robert Scobleizer for insight into the goldmine that is the live data &amp; metadata behind Twitter (and to a larger extent, Facebook).</p>
<p>Once filtering of Twitter becomes better and better, there&#8217;ll be some amazing value in the link economy.</p>
<p>I basically do not twitter unless I have something useful/a useful link.</p>
<p>-t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timbo</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-20060</link>
		<dc:creator>Timbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-20060</guid>
		<description>Baggers of Twitter clearly aren&#039;t business people/brains.

Check out Jeff Jarvis and Robert Scobleizer for insight into the goldmine that is the live data &amp; metadata behind Twitter (and to a larger extent, Facebook).

Once filtering of Twitter becomes better and better, there&#039;ll be some amazing value in the link economy.

I basically do not twitter unless I have something useful/a useful link.

-t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baggers of Twitter clearly aren&#8217;t business people/brains.</p>
<p>Check out Jeff Jarvis and Robert Scobleizer for insight into the goldmine that is the live data &amp; metadata behind Twitter (and to a larger extent, Facebook).</p>
<p>Once filtering of Twitter becomes better and better, there&#8217;ll be some amazing value in the link economy.</p>
<p>I basically do not twitter unless I have something useful/a useful link.</p>
<p>-t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support Your LBS?</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>Support Your LBS?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>[...] Geelong yesterday.  As you&#8217;ve probably read in cyclingnews (or my constant Twitter updates - cyclingnews&#8217; inevitable replacement) the race was abandoned due to extreme winds.  In all my years of bike racing I&#8217;ve never [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geelong yesterday.  As you&#8217;ve probably read in cyclingnews (or my constant Twitter updates &#8211; cyclingnews&#8217; inevitable replacement) the race was abandoned due to extreme winds.  In all my years of bike racing I&#8217;ve never [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whopper</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3039</link>
		<dc:creator>Whopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-3039</guid>
		<description>Both layouts suck because they are the SAME. This would point towards both sites being owned by the same company and explain why CN went through the redesign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both layouts suck because they are the SAME. This would point towards both sites being owned by the same company and explain why CN went through the redesign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whopper</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-20059</link>
		<dc:creator>Whopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-20059</guid>
		<description>Both layouts suck because they are the SAME. This would point towards both sites being owned by the same company and explain why CN went through the redesign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both layouts suck because they are the SAME. This would point towards both sites being owned by the same company and explain why CN went through the redesign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-2983</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a supplement not a replacement.  I wouldn’t use it as ‘news aggregating’, more as supplementing the usual channels. You can’t rely on a rider’s tweet to act as a race report or even a measure of his/her own day on the bike. And what happens when they aren’t riding?

The links are often to either uninteresting photos or their own blog/news items which you’d have read anyway (most journos do this and it gets annoying quite quickly).

I keep the list of people I’m following pretty short. The comic, Eurosport’s David Harmon @spokesmen, Brad (naturally) and Wegelius. I check out who they and others are following in case something catches my eye but most of the time they don’t grab my attention. Simon Gerrans proved interesting recently because he’s a TdF rider who wasn’t in the Tour. I’m sure George H, Lance and Levi and all those other chaps are really fine people but that doesn’t mean I want to devour every morsel from their verbal table.

I drop into CN now only when I want minor race reports or stats – the ones not available on my usual stop-off points. The new look takes longer to load (and I’ve always been impatient), and it means tech articles and nutrition are less likely to catch my eye (though it’s partly because I spend so little time there).

I generally don’t click on ads – partly because I’m in the UK so they mostly won’t apply and partly because if I want something I’ll decide in my own time then go and find it. But I’m already an advertiser’s worst nightmare – I’m short of money, only buy when I can justify the purchase and check everything before I spend. And I use Opera’s Block Content feature to avoid those pulsing, animated Flash ads that gobble up download and processing resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a supplement not a replacement.  I wouldn’t use it as ‘news aggregating’, more as supplementing the usual channels. You can’t rely on a rider’s tweet to act as a race report or even a measure of his/her own day on the bike. And what happens when they aren’t riding?</p>
<p>The links are often to either uninteresting photos or their own blog/news items which you’d have read anyway (most journos do this and it gets annoying quite quickly).</p>
<p>I keep the list of people I’m following pretty short. The comic, Eurosport’s David Harmon @spokesmen, Brad (naturally) and Wegelius. I check out who they and others are following in case something catches my eye but most of the time they don’t grab my attention. Simon Gerrans proved interesting recently because he’s a TdF rider who wasn’t in the Tour. I’m sure George H, Lance and Levi and all those other chaps are really fine people but that doesn’t mean I want to devour every morsel from their verbal table.</p>
<p>I drop into CN now only when I want minor race reports or stats – the ones not available on my usual stop-off points. The new look takes longer to load (and I’ve always been impatient), and it means tech articles and nutrition are less likely to catch my eye (though it’s partly because I spend so little time there).</p>
<p>I generally don’t click on ads – partly because I’m in the UK so they mostly won’t apply and partly because if I want something I’ll decide in my own time then go and find it. But I’m already an advertiser’s worst nightmare – I’m short of money, only buy when I can justify the purchase and check everything before I spend. And I use Opera’s Block Content feature to avoid those pulsing, animated Flash ads that gobble up download and processing resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-20058</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-20058</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a supplement not a replacement.  I wouldn’t use it as ‘news aggregating’, more as supplementing the usual channels. You can’t rely on a rider’s tweet to act as a race report or even a measure of his/her own day on the bike. And what happens when they aren’t riding?

The links are often to either uninteresting photos or their own blog/news items which you’d have read anyway (most journos do this and it gets annoying quite quickly).

I keep the list of people I’m following pretty short. The comic, Eurosport’s David Harmon @spokesmen, Brad (naturally) and Wegelius. I check out who they and others are following in case something catches my eye but most of the time they don’t grab my attention. Simon Gerrans proved interesting recently because he’s a TdF rider who wasn’t in the Tour. I’m sure George H, Lance and Levi and all those other chaps are really fine people but that doesn’t mean I want to devour every morsel from their verbal table.

I drop into CN now only when I want minor race reports or stats – the ones not available on my usual stop-off points. The new look takes longer to load (and I’ve always been impatient), and it means tech articles and nutrition are less likely to catch my eye (though it’s partly because I spend so little time there).

I generally don’t click on ads – partly because I’m in the UK so they mostly won’t apply and partly because if I want something I’ll decide in my own time then go and find it. But I’m already an advertiser’s worst nightmare – I’m short of money, only buy when I can justify the purchase and check everything before I spend. And I use Opera’s Block Content feature to avoid those pulsing, animated Flash ads that gobble up download and processing resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a supplement not a replacement.  I wouldn’t use it as ‘news aggregating’, more as supplementing the usual channels. You can’t rely on a rider’s tweet to act as a race report or even a measure of his/her own day on the bike. And what happens when they aren’t riding?</p>
<p>The links are often to either uninteresting photos or their own blog/news items which you’d have read anyway (most journos do this and it gets annoying quite quickly).</p>
<p>I keep the list of people I’m following pretty short. The comic, Eurosport’s David Harmon @spokesmen, Brad (naturally) and Wegelius. I check out who they and others are following in case something catches my eye but most of the time they don’t grab my attention. Simon Gerrans proved interesting recently because he’s a TdF rider who wasn’t in the Tour. I’m sure George H, Lance and Levi and all those other chaps are really fine people but that doesn’t mean I want to devour every morsel from their verbal table.</p>
<p>I drop into CN now only when I want minor race reports or stats – the ones not available on my usual stop-off points. The new look takes longer to load (and I’ve always been impatient), and it means tech articles and nutrition are less likely to catch my eye (though it’s partly because I spend so little time there).</p>
<p>I generally don’t click on ads – partly because I’m in the UK so they mostly won’t apply and partly because if I want something I’ll decide in my own time then go and find it. But I’m already an advertiser’s worst nightmare – I’m short of money, only buy when I can justify the purchase and check everything before I spend. And I use Opera’s Block Content feature to avoid those pulsing, animated Flash ads that gobble up download and processing resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Civetta</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2982</link>
		<dc:creator>Civetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-2982</guid>
		<description>Except that about a third at least of the stuff I get on twitter is links to fuller stories elsewhere, which generally I’ll cast a quick eye over. For me, the argument here is more about using twitter to build your own news aggregating service, rather than using CN etc. to do it for you. Twitter doesn’t altogether provide that much news in itself (unless you call Manuel Quinziato’s endless coffee breaks or Bradley Wiggins’ alcohol consumption “news”). CTs’ example was Wiggins’ blood profiles being released: well, sure, he said they were being released on twitter, but you had to go elsewhere (CN as it happens) to actually see them.

As for twitter being “dangerous”, well, people are lazy, but on the whole (apart from the potential LA stalker type you seem to evoke ;-) ), they just aren’t that daft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that about a third at least of the stuff I get on twitter is links to fuller stories elsewhere, which generally I’ll cast a quick eye over. For me, the argument here is more about using twitter to build your own news aggregating service, rather than using CN etc. to do it for you. Twitter doesn’t altogether provide that much news in itself (unless you call Manuel Quinziato’s endless coffee breaks or Bradley Wiggins’ alcohol consumption “news”). CTs’ example was Wiggins’ blood profiles being released: well, sure, he said they were being released on twitter, but you had to go elsewhere (CN as it happens) to actually see them.</p>
<p>As for twitter being “dangerous”, well, people are lazy, but on the whole (apart from the potential LA stalker type you seem to evoke ;-) ), they just aren’t that daft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Civetta</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-20057</link>
		<dc:creator>Civetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-20057</guid>
		<description>Except that about a third at least of the stuff I get on twitter is links to fuller stories elsewhere, which generally I’ll cast a quick eye over. For me, the argument here is more about using twitter to build your own news aggregating service, rather than using CN etc. to do it for you. Twitter doesn’t altogether provide that much news in itself (unless you call Manuel Quinziato’s endless coffee breaks or Bradley Wiggins’ alcohol consumption “news”). CTs’ example was Wiggins’ blood profiles being released: well, sure, he said they were being released on twitter, but you had to go elsewhere (CN as it happens) to actually see them.

As for twitter being “dangerous”, well, people are lazy, but on the whole (apart from the potential LA stalker type you seem to evoke ;-) ), they just aren’t that daft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that about a third at least of the stuff I get on twitter is links to fuller stories elsewhere, which generally I’ll cast a quick eye over. For me, the argument here is more about using twitter to build your own news aggregating service, rather than using CN etc. to do it for you. Twitter doesn’t altogether provide that much news in itself (unless you call Manuel Quinziato’s endless coffee breaks or Bradley Wiggins’ alcohol consumption “news”). CTs’ example was Wiggins’ blood profiles being released: well, sure, he said they were being released on twitter, but you had to go elsewhere (CN as it happens) to actually see them.</p>
<p>As for twitter being “dangerous”, well, people are lazy, but on the whole (apart from the potential LA stalker type you seem to evoke ;-) ), they just aren’t that daft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-2981</guid>
		<description>Twitter is dangerous.  We all know Twitter fails to give the full story but the worry is do you then go and find the full story.Humans are lazy by nature so we think to ourselves ‘great Lance says he’s bought a new house on Twitter’. What we don’t do then is go out and find where it is, how much it cost him etc. So that means the cycling news websites miss out on traffic they’d previously got from informing us about Lance’s new house. It also means we miss out on getting the full story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is dangerous.  We all know Twitter fails to give the full story but the worry is do you then go and find the full story.Humans are lazy by nature so we think to ourselves ‘great Lance says he’s bought a new house on Twitter’. What we don’t do then is go out and find where it is, how much it cost him etc. So that means the cycling news websites miss out on traffic they’d previously got from informing us about Lance’s new house. It also means we miss out on getting the full story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-20056</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-20056</guid>
		<description>Twitter is dangerous.  We all know Twitter fails to give the full story but the worry is do you then go and find the full story.Humans are lazy by nature so we think to ourselves ‘great Lance says he’s bought a new house on Twitter’. What we don’t do then is go out and find where it is, how much it cost him etc. So that means the cycling news websites miss out on traffic they’d previously got from informing us about Lance’s new house. It also means we miss out on getting the full story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is dangerous.  We all know Twitter fails to give the full story but the worry is do you then go and find the full story.Humans are lazy by nature so we think to ourselves ‘great Lance says he’s bought a new house on Twitter’. What we don’t do then is go out and find where it is, how much it cost him etc. So that means the cycling news websites miss out on traffic they’d previously got from informing us about Lance’s new house. It also means we miss out on getting the full story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/is-cyclingnews-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2980</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/?p=5392#comment-2980</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this picture in yesterday&#039;s stage in the Tour of Poland:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/66th-tour-de-pologne-upt/stages/stage-4/photos/74071

Can&#039;t blame them from wanting to celebrate the Giro I guess.

These sloppy mistakes should never be happening by a publication like cyclingnews!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with this picture in yesterday&#8217;s stage in the Tour of Poland:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/66th-tour-de-pologne-upt/stages/stage-4/photos/74071" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/66th-tour-de-pologne-upt/stages/stage-4/photos/74071</a></p>
<p>Can&#8217;t blame them from wanting to celebrate the Giro I guess.</p>
<p>These sloppy mistakes should never be happening by a publication like cyclingnews!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.cyclingtipsblog.com @ 2010-09-10 23:58:55 -->