Do What Works To Win

January 28, 2010 · Comments

by Justin Coulson (School of Psychology, University of Wollongong)  You can also read his personal blog here.

Cycling Tips readers have enjoyed two top-notch interviews with PRO riders in recent weeks. The first was with Simon Gerrans, and the second was with Koen de Kort. A really interesting commonality appeared in each interview that I’d like to address from a psychological perspective.

Gerro stated:

“I wish that I focused more on what I was good at earlier on. As a young rider you try to be good at everything. You’re trying to be sprinter, a climber, in the breakaways…everything. It has taken me until the past couple of years to figure out what I’m going to be good at. It was eating at me that I was a jack of all trades but master of none. Then I realised that there’s a career in being a jack of all trades…and its in the breakaways. You have to be able to climb, sprint, and spend the day up the road. So basically find out what you’re good and you’ll develop as you get older.”

This was echoed by Koen:

“Focus on what you’re good at… Just choose one thing.”

Traditionally those who coach others to improve have often promoted a deficit-based approach. For example, a rider might say to his or her coach, “I’m no good on hills.” Then the coach will provide training to strengthen climbing ability.

While it is important to manage all aspects of our performance, Gerro and Koen are tapping into a different approach. Rather than focusing on improving weaknesses, they’re suggesting that building on strengths will make you a better rider.

The name of this process is “appreciative inquiry.” Appreciative inquiry links in neatly with goal setting to provide a powerful platform for positive outcomes in any aspect of life you want to make better. Originally developed for the benefit of business, appreciative inquiry is built on the idea that if you focus on what works, you are able to build and improve that rather than forever focusing on fixing what is not working. (As an aside, there is merit in addressing weaknesses. However constantly working on weaknesses can often be demotivating. Progress is often slow, and the work is laborious and rarely fun. Working on strengths tends to enliven, and lift).

There are four steps to effective appreciative inquiry, and they apply as much in cycling or personal life as they do to businesses and organisations.

1. Discover

The discovery phase of appreciative inquiry is where we identify what is working well. The sport of bike riding and racing makes our strengths readily visible and we can generally see quite clearly what is working and what is not. In Gerro’s case he saw that while he was not a true climber or sprinter, he was a handy rider at both, and with great endurance he is good at getting away in a break and staying out there. Talking honestly with other riders about your performance, and carefully considering it yourself, will give you perspective on what your strengths are while you’re on the bike.

2. Dream

The dream process is where you begin to think about what your strengths will allow you to do. I bet Gerro’s heart starts pounding whenever he merely thinks about riding away from a bunch only 5kms into a 180km stage. And Greipel or Cav would be forever envisioning the moment they dart off Renshaw’s wheel for the final 200m. When you dream, enjoy the feeling of being out in front on the climb, or riding hard for your team at the front of the bunch for kilometers on end (a la O’Grady). An important note: the dream phase must be specific. It has to be precisely what you want out of a given race, be it a particular placing or time, or some other result. No airy-fairy dreaming.

3. Design

This is the planning phase. Once we have identified what is working and worked out what the end goal is, we need a plan. Too many riders try to win every race. While that’s a great thing to be able to do, it’s really not feasible for most of us. Good coaches will encourage you to pick a handful of races that matter most to you, and then develop your strengths to enable you to succeed in those races. You’ll see the PRO riders do this all the time. Lance wasn’t sure about Geelong’s world championship circuit because he heard it was too flat (which he now knows is not the case). Cadel missed key races in 2009 to concentrate on getting his rainbow jersey. Riders deliberately target specific stages of a multi-stage race because of their strengths. A good plan can only be developed if we know a) what we’re good at, and b) what we want. So design specifically for what you are good at.

4. Deliver (or Destiny)

This is the stage of appreciative inquiry when you go and get what you planned for.

As Koen de Kort said:

“Now, even though I live close to the mountains in Spain I don’t train on the long ones because I’ll never be a climber. As long as I can survive the long ones I’ll keep in the race.  I’m better off spending my time in the short climbs where I can win races.

Koen still climbs, and he still undoubtedly has sprint work included in his training schedule. But like most PRO riders, Koen knows what works and he spends his time developing the specific strengths that will bring him the best results.

Where to from here?

Consider and discover your strengths. Have a look at your upcoming race calendar and choose a couple of events from the upcoming season that suit your strengths. Dream about your results. There should be a couple that you think you can win with the right plan. Design that plan by focusing on what you are good at. Do the work. Then go and take delivery of what you’ve worked for.

  • MtbSkillsCoachPat
    Justin.

    Super piece of advice and very nicely linked to the examples from our two Pro's.

    Thanks for contributing to CT and providing inspiration.

    Testing the legs and tuning up the ski technique in Champery Switzerland, will try to ski into France today, 650km of ski trail to go at here ;-)
  • kylieonwheels
    That's really inspiring and timely for me too, Justin, thanks.
  • Great Tip for the start of the season Justin!!

    As a hack rider, I feel I need to work on my weakness (climbing) in order to be around at the end of a race to take advantage of my strength (sprinting). A PRO, who's 'weakness' is climbing, is still a phenominal climber ( I have heard plenty of stories of guys who go out on hilly rides with Robbie Mc in the hope of some bragging rights, only to find that he is awesome in the hills).
    But you cover this in the title - "Do What works to Win".
  • Mike you make an important point, and it's one I've tried not to gloss over in the article.

    We can't ignore our weaknesses.

    But so long as our weaknesses are "strong enough" to get us through, we can then utilise our strengths to get great results. The guy I train with most is a sprinter, like you. He manages his weakness (climbing) by making sure he works on it just enough to stay with the bunch on hills. But he doesn't spend long hours going through what he calls "mountain goat" territory. He still focuses on sprints. It's his strength. And if he's in the bunch at the end, he'll roll most guys.

    Personally, I'm strongest on hills and endurance type riding. So I work really hard on them (I also enjoy them more than sprinting). My goal is to get away from guys like you and my mate Dave so you can't destroy me in the sprint = )

    But in this article, there is much more to it than that. I have chosen two races in the coming three months, and then another one in September. These races are specifically suited to someone with my abilities. They're long and/or they're hilly. And in those races I'm planning on making it count. In all the other races I know I'm very likely to be there at the end but in all likelihood, unless I can get away with another couple of guys like me, I'll be racing for 10th! So by knowing my strengths and utilising them I can then dream, design, and then deliver the outcomes I'm looking for.
  • JC
    Yeah it's all relative. Roger Federer's "weakness" is his backhand. It's good when your weakness is still world class and then some!!
  • JC
    For me it's more about working on what I'm less bad at. If I only worked on what I'm good at I'd never do anything!!
  • I like this tip ... focus on base, build on weaknesses, maximise strengths, know your limits, do what works to win.
  • Tim
    This is a fantastic and timely post for me.

    I know I can ride hills (when healthy), and I have notched up a few road wins with sprint finishes (albeit slight inclines, which finds people out)...

    My weaknesses are riding into the wind. A 62-65kg frame does not make it easy to work up the road in a small bunch on a breakaway.
    Also terrible in a TT. So clearly not GC (?).

    I've just engaged a coach (hat tip: thanks James Foran) for this Combine season and beyond, so it will be interesting to see what he concentrates on...stronger legs for hills, endurance, I'm clueless. Also will be interesting to see what his approach is.

    Given that I can sprint a little and climb, I'll be interested to see how this can be applied.

    Thanks again WW.

    Word to the Wade.

    tim
  • It takes a while to work out what you're good at and what you're not so good at as you develop as a rider. These things sometimes change as well. I never used to be a good climber but I started riding in the hills more just because I enjoyed getting out of the city. After many smashfests up in the Dandenongs I started to be able hold my own in the climbs. Now I consider climbing one of my strengths. I never would have thought...
blog comments powered by Disqus